May
11
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on May-11-2009

The Federal Reserve and Timothy Geithner have said, on a number of occasions, that the economy is starting to show signs of a recovery.

Remember the “Green Shoots” Bernanke observed?  Remember how everyone was curious as to why THEY were not seeing said green shoots? I’m guessing you do, and I am guessing you are still not seeing them.

Well, over the weekend the White House appears to have ripped the green shoots of a recovery and tossed them aside – there will be no recovery for those in the job market until 2010.

Speaking on C-SPAN, Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said that she expected theG.D.P. to begin growing in the fourth quarter of this year. Ben S. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, made a similar prediction last week.

But Ms. Romer also said that she expected unemployment to rise even after the economy turns, saying that the G.D.P. has to grow at a rate of about 2.5 percent before unemployment will fall. Before that happens, she said, it is “unfortunately pretty realistic” that the unemployment rate could reach 9.5 percent. A reasonable estimate for the G.D.P.’s growth rate in 2010, she said, is three percent.

9.5% on the unemployment in 2009?  To me that seems less than realistic.  

I’ve said a number of times that I expect to hit 10% by the end of this year. If the nation sees a loss of another 1.1M people by 12/31, the U.S. Unemployment rate will end up at roughly 10.2% 

Here is the big question, though: Will the government switch people from “unemployed” to “underemployed” (those who have given up hope and are no longer looking) in order to keep the reported unemployment rate under 10%? My guess is yes.

If one looks past the discussion of economic news and listens to the other information, Ms. Romer is giving the public a look at the next major target the administration has in mind: Health care

“When you actually look at that budget going out in time, the thing that is going to bankrupt us is government expenditures on health care,” she said. 

Insurers of all kinds, take note and start to duck and cover.  The heat will be rising for you very shortly.



 
Dec
15
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on December-15-2008
Ah, this is music to my ears.

Last week Congress shot down the proposed automaker bailout bill.  While the proposed legislation passed the House it was unable to get out of the Senate. Almost as soon as the bill was declared dead, the White House comes out and says it will find a way to utilize TARP funds to provide funding for the auto industry. Wait… I thought TARP funds were for purchasing “toxic” assets from the banking industry… oh well.

Sunday morning the White House released a statement saying auto loans deals are not imminent, and that the administration is “considering ways to provide emergency aid to General Motors and Chrysler “.

The delay could simply be due to President Bush traveling, or there could be additional hang-ups that have not been made public.  

In no way do I support loans to GM and Chrysler.  I will continue to say this – if we are in a free market economy, isn’t the consumer trying to tell GM and Chrysler, “Hey!  We don’t like your product”?  I see no need to throw good money at poorly run companies.   Both have had the chance to change their method of business for years, neither have taken the opportunity.

Now, I do feel bad for anyone – ANYONE – who would be impacted by an implosion of the industry.  From the line worker to the technology professional. From the dealer selling the products to the upstream supplier.  They would fall victim to a company who lived past its prime.