May
18
Posted (Van Santos) in Technology on May-18-2009

Every time a new search engine, with functionality different than The Google, comes to market people instantly declare “This is a Google Killer!”  Somehow a new, unknown, technology outfit is going to overtake the search giant simply because they do something in a different manner. Possible. Not likely.

The first time the “Google Killer” mantra was waved about came with the launch of Cuil.  Who?  Exactly.  This company claimed their technology would allow specific search results, in turn providing less clutter for the user. It didn’t. Forget even obtaining a 2rd tier search engine status – like Snap or Gigablast – Cuil has faded into history as a sub-standard search engine that happened to ride a quick marketing wave.

Fast-forward a few years and enter Wolfram Alpha.

Here we have a new technology, a new search engine that is “computational”.  This search engine does not go out and spider the web looking for result, instead Wolfram Alpha uses an internal knowledge base to generate results (and does so impressively, I may add).

When Google first started, one of the main user groups seemed to be developers/geeks/scientists as the service the engine provided directed one to results with no crap.  You needed to understand how a specific function python worked, Google found the answer – back then, there was usually only one or two – and you could be on your way.  This is exactly what I see Wolfram Alpha as.  A tool/application for “hardcore” users.

I suspect the casual, everyday user will find little use in Wolfram Alpha at first glance.  Spend some time playing around, understanding the technology, and the value becomes apparent almost immediately.

Let’s be realistic, the next “it” application doesn’t simply appear over night. It’s in the wild for some time before the masses even realize. In no way is this new service a Google Killer but, in due time, this has the potential to be a significant Google competitor.



 
Dec
30
Posted (Van Santos) in Technology on December-30-2008

I’ve wondered how useful a Twitter search engine would actually be, and I would have to say (much to my surprise) it’s quite useful!  

Twithority ranks search results by highest ranking users first and by most recent tweets by the top 10,000 Twitter users. I ran a few test and found a number of things I wouldn’t have expected, nor ever would have thought of to search for in the first place.

Kinda sweet.



 
Dec
10
Posted (Van Santos) in Technology on December-10-2008

I was reading an article on TechCrunch yesterday about Ask.com “experimental” search feature that is really nothing more than a giant ad engine.  Take a look at what they mean.

Search for… Stocks or Mortgages or Cars or Music

And where is the content?  Maybe this is a bad design flaw, but it just makes the search engine look bad.  

This got me asking, however, why is Ask.com still around?  While I understand a company attempting to fill a niche market I cannot see how they are filling this goal.

Ask.com was purchased by IAC for 1.85Billion in cash, and is still ranked as the #5 search engine out there, but is there a purpose they serve?  Their market share has been consistently trending downward since 2006, no consistent business plan seems to be in place, and for the life of me I cannot figure out who their target users are.  

I’m guessing IAC hasn’t sold off the ask.com technology and web properties to competitors simply due to the fact they have no ability to recoup the $1.85B spent at this point – plus a huge write-off wouldn’t look good at this point either.