Jul
02
Posted (Van Santos) in Movie Thoughts on July-2-2009

Movie: Public Enemies
Director: Michael Mann (Heat, Collateral)
Starring: Johnny Depp, Christian Bale

Story

Public Enemies is a window into two worlds during the “golden age” of bank robbery. On one side we see how John Dillinger, played by Johnny Depp, has a softer side to himself – such as a man who is in love. The second point of view is how desperate the Federal Government is to stop and catch Dillinger and the bank robbers of the time. The focus falls on Melvin Purvis, portrayed by Christian Bale, as the man who is willing to do anything in order to stop Dillinger and his fellow robbers.

While an interesting view into the two worlds, the story seemed to draw out and, at times, have a loss of focus. It didn’t seem as “tight” at it could have been. A few times, it felt as if the movie was dragging on. The story telling that haunted Mann with the Miami Vice movie seemed to semi-bleed into Public Enemies.

Points: 1/2

Sound

Well, my initial thoughts were “Come on, it’s Michael Mann!” but there is one problem with the sound design. It seemed that, at times, it was difficult to hear the actors. Maybe the problem was with the theater but the volume appeared to fluctuate. T

The gun scenes were AMAZING. Mann’s movie “Heat” set the bar for what gun battles in modern cinema should be like. The magic carried forward into Public Enemies. A number of times I was sitting there saying “Wow”

Points: 1.5/2

Acting

Depp captivates the audience. You believe you are actually watching Dillinger, and feeling his emotions – both positive and negative – as the movie unfolds. Bale does not have a chance to shine as he does not have an overwhelming amount of screen time. When he does, however; one gets the feeling that he is a conflicted law officer who begins to compromise his values in order to gain the ultimate goal of catching a criminal.

Another worthwhile performance is Billy Crudup as J. Edgar Hoover. Outstanding!

Points: 2/2

Cinematography

Again, my initial action was “It’s Mann!” but I do have two complaints. It seemed as if the free floating camera – the “in the scene” view – lead to a rather jerky viewing experience at times. And it also got old. The second complain, and I never thought I would say this, but the digital cameras and filming has lead to a viewing experience that is almost too real. Not to sound old fashion here but I like my movies to… well.. feel like movies and not as if I’m watching a play except on the big screen. I don’t need to see every detail, every pore, on the actors face. Nor do I need to see every bit of dust on the bank counter.

To take the other side of the argument, there were to small but cool shots that did stand out to me. The first is during a night scene when agents are chasing Dillinger through a forest. The fog coming off of the hillside looked so.. vivid, so “alive” it was amazing. The second was watching the last breath come out of a man who just died. Very unique, very visual and helped bring home the point that he died.

Points: 1.25/2

Personal Enjoyment

The movie felt long and wondering at points but when it was on it amazing. While I wouldn’t say that it is a movie masterpiece, it did push the limits in terms of visual recreation of the period and trying new techniques in story telling. I enjoyed but wasn’t blown over.

Points: 1.5/2

Total Points: 7.25/10



 
Apr
19
Posted (Van Santos) in Just Stuff on April-19-2009

Crank: High Voltage

How and why do dumb ass movies such as Crank: High Voltage ever get green-lit?  I’m dead serious on this one.  I understand there is a certain “appeal to the lowest common denominator” thing going on here but has the entertainment industry become so desperate for ideas that they have to create movies with taglines like “He was dead…But he got better”

Initially, I was worried when I saw that IMDB rates this movie as an 8.1 – especially worried seeing that Heat, a classic movie, was rated 8.2 – but that worry was alleviate when I found out the movie only pulled in 6.5M this weekend.  I now have a little more faith in the viewing public!

Rain… Rain…

The rain has been pouring all day here.  Usually, I enjoy a good rain.  Something about the sound of the water hitting the window is usually soothing…. and rather conducive to outstanding sleep.  That simply wasn’t the case today.   

I’ve actually had a rather down day today, worse than I’ve had in some time, and the rain and general mood outside hasn’t helped much either… I just with the rain would simply stop for now.

Boston Marathon

In a past life I was a runner.  I found a sense of peace in the experience.  Sure, part of me was doing the activity simply for the exercise, but running put my mind at ease at times.  About for years ago that whole thing simply changed.  One day I woke up and it simply didn’t appeal any longer.  It really didn’t do anything for me.

Well, tomorrow someone I know is running the Boston Marathon…. I wish him the best in his efforts.  I wish I had the desire or… well… ability to take on such a feat.  



 
Feb
04
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on February-4-2009

Hello, pot… this is kettle calling again… just wanted to point out that you are black.

At a news conference today, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said that move the administration are currently making are aimed at “restoring trust” in the financial system. If that is the case, if President Obama wanted to restore trust, wouldn’t it make sense to fire Tim Geithner? Larry Kudlow, economist and journalist, thinks so as well:

Geithner never answered the question put to him by senators Kyl and Bunning: Would he have paid his back taxes if he were not nominated to run the Treasury? His issue has never been resolved. He will never have the full trust of the country…This is a matter of personal character and accountability. It is a matter of honesty. Too many of our leaders suffer big deficits in these areas.

How can we trust a man who “forgot” to pay his taxes for a few years to restore trust in the system?

Compensation limiting for executives tied to bailout money?

Not to be ringing the socialist alarm once again, but what does limiting the compensation of executives sound like to you? In no way am I advocating that people should be making millions a year for driving a company into the ground but this has the potential to open the door to other such actions in the name of “market stability”.

Actually, I’ll go one step further and say that a case can be made for why a company that requested funds should be limited to how the money is spent. Ok, that sounds fair… until you hear one name: J.P. Morgan

J.P. Morgan/Chase was forced to take TARP funds from the government.

J.P. Morgan was not in need of capital funding, nor did they request it, so why should J.P. Morgan/Chase be limited to what they pay their management? I understand the need to limitation, but when you start forcing companies to do thing – like take the funding, then what executives should earn – is a very dangerous.

ion Television

No clue what cable channel ion Television is but Heat, the Michael Mann classic and arguably one of the top 10 movies of the last 30 years, is on right now. I know what I am going to do….

UPDATE 2/5/09, 3:32 PM – it turns out that J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs will not be limited when it comes to compensation.