Mar
12
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on March-12-2009

If you happen to read my blog on a regular basis you are well aware of my feelings surrounding government bailouts for the automotive industry. If you don’t happen to stop by on a regular basis, let me recap: I believe a bailout of the U.S. automotive industry is one of the biggest wastes of money possible.

For years now, U.S. car companies poorly managed just about every aspect of their business – product lines, corporate image, customer satisfaction and labor management – yet they claim the current economic environment caused their misfortunes. Sorry, not the case…

That said, I cannot believe the arrogance displayed by Chrysler president Thomas LaSorda on 3/10/2009.

Chrysler LLC threatened last night to pull the company’s production out of Canada – a move that would throw 9,000 employees out of work – unless governments here provide $2.3-billion (U.S.) in loans and its Canadian union agrees to slash labour costs by 25 per cent.

At a parliamentary committee hearing last night, Chrysler president Thomas LaSorda said the company would commit to maintaining roughly a quarter of its North American production in Canada if its “needs” are met.
“The current success and long-term viability of Chrysler’s manufacturing operations in Canada is very much dependent on three critical factors,” said the Detroit-based executive, who grew up four blocks from the firm’s Windsor plant where his father, Frank, worked and was union president.

“Chrysler LLC cannot afford to manufacture products in a jurisdiction that is uncompetitive relative to other automotive jurisdictions.”

Essentially, Chrysler is telling the Canadian parliament “Give us $2.3B or else!” How does such a demand NOT equate to corporate blackmail? It is quite clear that Chrysler is not committed to protecting jobs in Canada as the corporation slashed a number of positions over the last two years and plan on more cuts in the future.

Not to beat a dead horse, but the market has spoken regarding the survival of Chrysler and GM. While I feel for those working at Chrysler Canada, these companies should fail.

In no way should any company be allowed to hold a government hostage due to their mismanagement. The continued support in the form of bailouts will only send the message to large organizations that a do “do what you wish, the tax payer will catch you” mentality is acceptable in business.

It’s not.



 
Dec
22
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on December-22-2008

Wait a second…. was the world asleep when this happened – Canada has offered $3.29 billion in loans to the Canadian subsidiaries of U.S. Automakers.

How much will the automakers obtain from governments around the world in the name of a “bailout”? For those keeping score at home, thus far we have…

$17 Billion from the United States
$3 Billion from Canada 

That’s a nice $20 Billion thrown at a problem that is larger than simply running short of money, it’s bad corporate management.  

Just so that I don’t offend any of my Canadian friends, I have no problem with your Government doing what it sees fit for it’s own interest. My issues are a) the automakers having loans in general and b) what will the the worldwide total “loaned” to Detroit?  

This will end up costing tax payers world wide more money than anyone had ever expected.