| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Business on June-2-2009
|
|
|
You knew it, I knew it… my hairless cat new it. China was going to make major headway into the automotive industry by picking through the bones of Chrysler and GM. The 1st bit to go is the Hummer line.
General Motors Corp. has struck a deal to sell its Hummer truck unit to a Chinese industrial business, the two companies confirmed Tuesday.
Privately owned Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Company Ltd., based in China, will acquire the truck brand, which has been part of GM since 1999. Tengzhong said it plans to keep Hummer’s management team.
“We plan to … allow Humer to innovate and grow in exciting new ways under the leadership and continuity of its current management team,” said Yang Yi, chief executive of Tengzhong.
Yang said the deal “will allow Hummer to better meet demand for new products such as more fuel-efficient vehicles in the U.S.”
The companies said the deal would likely close by the end of September.
This leaves other brands like – Pontiac, Saturn and Saab to be sold off or left to die. One could easily see how a Eurpoean company could pick up Saab, but what values does Pontiac and Saturn hold for potential buyers? Saturn has never turned a profit and Pontiac as a razor thing margin… The value – specifically for Saturn – is the dealer network.
If a Chinese company wanted to have a pre-establish dealer network this is the chance – buy Saturn and exploit the dealer network. As I believe Chinese manufactures have the ultimate aim to tap the U.S. market, such a development wouldn’t be a surprise to me.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Business on December-18-2008
|
|
|
Roughly a month ago the big three went before Congress asking for financial assistance (bailout, loan, pick the term you would like to use) due to a potential collapse in the industry. Actually, General Motors and Chrysler were the two organizations hurting the most. Turned out that Ford, the company everyone expected to fall first, was in a better position that anyone had expected.
During Congressional proceedings, and a number of times since, General Motors boldly stated that “Bankruptcy is not an option”. People scoffed at the arrogance of GM, except a large number of Politicians. Congress continued to push forward with financial assistance, until the air was let out of their balloon – Congress decided that it wasn’t going to happen.
Almost immediately the Bush Administration stated they would use TARP funds in order to prevent the collapse of the Detroit three…. and then nothing happened. Deafening silence filled the space where there was once near definitive support from the Administration. No real progress or information became available until today. Suddenly a “controlled” bankruptcy was an option.
I thought everyone – Administration and automakers – said they would not accept such a situation. But what exactly is a controlled bankruptcy? Think about recent government actions – who have they helped?
A controlled bankruptcy will look something like the AIG bailout.
If this is the option chosen, I suspect the government will tell the affected automakers what products they can have, what lines need to be sold or closed, and what price structures need to be in place. Oh, and they will have a majority of their debt wiped away. Even with that option, members of the auto industry still say Bankruptcy is not an option – structured or otherwise.
Even in the face of some form of help, the industry does not want to change. What? Yes, they still say bankruptcy is not an option as it will destroy the brand. What they seem to be missing is that, essentially, their business needs to be completely restructured to achieve a level of competitiveness in the marketplace and have no ability to do so (and maybe no desire). yet they have no desire to make the necessary changes.
Tomorrow may very well be an interesting, if not, historic day in the economy.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Business on December-16-2008
|
|
|
The government has stakes in major financial institutions, is about to provide financing to the auto industry, and some speculate there may be a nationalization of the industry. Where is American Capitalism headed?
For example..
One stipulation the auto industry faces with the bailout is the appointment of a “Car Czar”. Whoever is appointed to the position has the ability to determine the manufactures continue to maintain “a product mix and cost structure that is competitive in the United States market.” (House.gov)
A product mix and cost structure? Does this not sound like the person who is the “Car Czar” has the ability to determine what cars should be sold in the US marketplace, and does it not sound like they have the ability to influence the price?
The whole point of a free market economy is that goods and services are traded/sold for a price that is determined by both parties (buyers and sellers). When price setting take place we can no longer say we are truly a free market economy, it resembles the economic environment of China. Sorry, it really does.
Let’s face it, a true free market economy has not existed for a long time in the United States, if ever. What we see now, due to the recession, is the illusion giving way to reality.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Business on December-15-2008
|
|
|
Everyone keeps talking about what would happen if the auto industry went into bankruptcy, and the one thing people consistently talks about is the autoworkers (obviously). There are roughly 2 million workers in the industry be it assembly, auto parts or in dealerships.
Here is how it breaks down, via CNN/Money:
|
State
|
Rank
|
Total jobs
|
Auto assembly jobs
|
Auto parts jobs
|
Auto sales jobs
|
|
Michigan
|
1
|
241,883
|
57,997
|
144,413
|
39,473
|
|
California
|
2
|
189,749
|
7,430
|
42,741
|
139,578
|
|
Ohio
|
3
|
159,061
|
21,974
|
89,244
|
47,843
|
|
Texas
|
4
|
137,191
|
9,104
|
28,487
|
99,600
|
|
Indiana
|
5
|
111,665
|
12,622
|
71,403
|
27,640
|
|
Florida
|
6
|
99,199
|
915
|
12,083
|
86,201
|
|
Illinois
|
7
|
93,763
|
7,227
|
35,936
|
50,600
|
|
New York
|
8
|
82,357
|
607
|
28,792
|
52,958
|
|
Tennessee
|
9
|
79,424
|
10,636
|
42,415
|
26,373
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
10
|
76,759
|
533
|
17,128
|
59,098
|
|
Kentucky
|
11
|
65,468
|
13,664
|
37,621
|
14,183
|
|
North Carolina
|
12
|
59,276
|
522
|
20,662
|
38,092
|
|
Missouri
|
13
|
55,722
|
11,122
|
17,935
|
26,665
|
|
Georgia
|
14
|
54,954
|
1,966
|
14,960
|
38,028
|
|
Alabama
|
15
|
49,346
|
10,519
|
20,189
|
18,638
|
|
Virginia
|
16
|
47,485
|
1,777
|
9,978
|
35,730
|
|
Wisconsin
|
17
|
46,488
|
4,037
|
15,699
|
26,752
|
|
New Jersey
|
18
|
43,294
|
688
|
7,100
|
35,506
|
|
South Carolina
|
19
|
41,285
|
4,773
|
18,863
|
17,649
|
|
Arizona
|
20
|
34,973
|
67
|
5,886
|
29,020
|
|
Washington
|
21
|
31,343
|
197
|
5,788
|
25,358
|
|
Maryland
|
22
|
30,688
|
205
|
4,192
|
26,291
|
|
Minnesota
|
23
|
29,598
|
832
|
6,059
|
22,707
|
|
Massachusetts
|
24
|
28,464
|
178
|
3,839
|
24,447
|
|
Iowa
|
25
|
24,634
|
57
|
10,611
|
13,966
|
|
Colorado
|
26
|
23,510
|
55
|
3,408
|
20,047
|
|
Oklahoma
|
27
|
21,484
|
2,037
|
5,048
|
14,399
|
|
Connecticut
|
28
|
21,086
|
166
|
5,734
|
15,186
|
|
Oregon
|
29
|
21,067
|
115
|
4,909
|
16,043
|
|
Mississippi
|
30
|
20,879
|
3,640
|
7,288
|
9,951
|
|
Louisiana
|
31
|
19,404
|
82
|
2,139
|
17,183
|
|
Kansas
|
32
|
19,036
|
2,984
|
4,922
|
11,130
|
|
Arkansas
|
33
|
17,142
|
0
|
6,981
|
10,161
|
|
Utah
|
34
|
15,684
|
10
|
5,442
|
10,232
|
|
Nebraska
|
35
|
13,650
|
15
|
5,303
|
8,332
|
|
Nevada
|
36
|
13,041
|
65
|
1,511
|
11,465
|
|
West Virginia
|
37
|
8,966
|
0
|
2,295
|
6,671
|
|
New Mexico
|
38
|
8,763
|
0
|
842
|
7,921
|
|
New Hampshire
|
39
|
8,329
|
0
|
797
|
7,532
|
|
Idaho
|
40
|
7,475
|
61
|
1,049
|
6,365
|
|
Maine
|
41
|
6,864
|
0
|
636
|
6,228
|
|
Delaware
|
42
|
6,600
|
946
|
1,036
|
4,618
|
|
North Dakota
|
43
|
5,539
|
212
|
1,236
|
4,091
|
|
Montana
|
44
|
5,410
|
0
|
1,020
|
4,390
|
|
South Dakota
|
45
|
5,194
|
0
|
1,104
|
4,090
|
|
Hawaii
|
46
|
4,968
|
0
|
393
|
4,575
|
|
Vermont
|
47
|
4,143
|
0
|
1,145
|
2,998
|
|
Rhode Island
|
48
|
4,123
|
0
|
476
|
3,647
|
|
Wyoming
|
49
|
2,817
|
0
|
287
|
2,530
|
|
Alaska
|
50
|
2,470
|
0
|
133
|
2,337
|
|
District of Columbia
|
51
|
242
|
0
|
20
|
222
|
Ok, so after the bailout goes through – and GM or Chrysler goes bankrupt in a few months, or a year, what will happen to these people? Isn’t giving a loan simply giving false hope?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Humor on December-9-2008
|
|
|
Don’t know who did this, but nice work by the creator!

|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Posted ( Van Santos) in Business on November-25-2008
|
|
|
Unless your head was buried in a pile of cocaine, or sand, whatever works for you, you know that the Big three automakers are really hurting these days and that pain really hit the market last week.
As Congress attempted to provide financial aid to the automotive industry some startling financial information became public – Ford has roughly 38 billion dollars on hand, or about three years of funding, where as GM has about 20 Billion, or one year worth, and Chrysler has 11B in the bank but no true estimate on how fast they are burning cash (since they are no longer public they do not need to disclose their financial information).
Rumors of bankruptcy, automotive collapse and a massive waive of unemployment was all over the press. It seemed that GM and Chrysler were about to fall apart overnight. While the misfortunes of Detroit have been documented for some time the rapid unwinding of the credit markets only added to woes of the carmakers. One rumor that received very little press, but actually makes business sense, was that GM was an acquisition target of Chinese carmakers SAIC and Dongfeng.
Little does most of the general U.S. public know but GM owns 35% of the Chinese automotive market share is considered to be a luxury brand! Let me put that in different terms – GM is a successful company in China. As SAIC and Dongfeng are attempting to expand market share in China and the U.S., plus achieve significant economies of scale, an acquisition of GM by a Chinese company only make good business sense.
If a Chinese rival acquired GM, do you think the companies’ workforce would be welcoming of their new overloads? Do you think the pride of individuals who get in the way, or do you think they would be happy for the survival of the “American” giant?
While I have no answer, I find such a scenario to be the ultimate irony for the financial crisis facing the United States today.
|
|
|
|
|
|