Jan
31
Posted (Van Santos) in Humor, Video on January-31-2010

Funny as hell and in no way is it safe for work.



Also, just bit of person history… my father told me the “Bull” story that is mentioned in this clip back in 1987. Ah, memories.

Tags: , ,



 
Jan
31
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on January-31-2010

This bit of news is interesting – UBS Bank could collapse if talks with the US over tax fraud fall through.

“The actions of UBS in the United States are very problematic. Not just because they are punishable but also because they threaten all of the bank’s activities,” Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf told Le Matin Dimanche newspaper.
“The Swiss economy and the job market would suffer on a major scale if UBS fails as a result of its licence being revoked in the United States,” she said.

It sounds like the U.S. is considering pulling the ability of UBS to act as a bank within the United States due to tax fraud / tax evasion, which would trigger the bank collapse and not due to current bank solvency issues.

I find it hard to believe U.S. regulators would allow such a thing to happen, instead opting for the fine route…

Tags:



 
Jan
30
Posted (Van Santos) in Humor on January-30-2010
We Hate Math

We Hate Math

Tags: , ,



 
Jan
30
Posted (Van Santos) in Business on January-30-2010

Really? You think?

From Bloomberg:

Roubini said more than half of the 5.7 percent expansion reported yesterday by the government was related to a replenishing of inventories and that consumption depended on monetary and fiscal stimulus. As these forces ebb, growth will slow to just 1.5 percent in the second half of 2010, he said.

“The headline number will look large and big, but actually when you dissect it, it’s very dismal and poor,” Roubini told Bloomberg Television in an interview at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. “I think we are in trouble.”

Roubini said while the world’s largest economy won’t relapse into recession, unemployment will rise from the current 10 percent, posing social and political challenges.

All on needs to do is look past the headlines, do a little personal research, in order to come to the conclusion that the economic recovery is not a recovery at all.

Tags: , ,



 
Jan
29
Posted (Van Santos) in Humor, Video on January-29-2010



Hard to believe Pee Wee (well, Paul Reubens) is 57 years old!

Tags: , ,



 
Jan
28
Posted (Van Santos) in Barack Obama on January-28-2010

If you missed it, President Obama gave the 2010 State of the Union yesterday evening (full text here) and there a number of things that really stand out:

One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted – immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

First, let’s get past the blame game. While Bush moved the the United States into two wars, and the economic conditions the United States started as far back as 1999, Obama needs to take responsibility for his actions since he came into office – most of which have made economic conditions worse. Also, he has expanded the war. If the goal was the stop where is the contraction of troops?

Second, he did take office with a government deep in debt – 10T to be exact. In 8 years President Bush added roughly 5T in debt. In 13 months President Obama will have added 4T in debt. In roughly one year he managed to do what Bush need 8 years to accomplish. Blaming the administration before you for the US debt problems is disingenuous at best.

Finally, this is the second time the President has claimed the economic has come back from the brink. In the next two years, when it is obvious it has continued to move downward, what will he say?

They don’t understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded but hard work on Main Street isn’t.

This was bad behavior by Government, Special Interest groups, Banks, Politicians and normal every day citizens. Not just Wall Street… and it isn’t that Wall Street “seems” to be rewarded, they were while Main Street continues to be screwed.

To recover the rest, I have proposed a fee on the biggest banks. I know Wall Street isn’t keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need.

Fair enough, but why are you not proposing fees on the Automakers that obtained huge amounts of federal funds?  Something to do with Unions, maybe?

Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed.

We’ve already talked about how there is no way to verify this number. NONE. The details behind these claims are very fuzzy, and when Mish @ GETA did some math on the subject it was clear the numbers didn’t add up.

Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the interstate highway system, our nation has always been built to compete. There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.

Fantastic for those in construction! Truly.

However, how many of the 1.2M business professionals, 455K hospitality professional, 2.1M manufacturers, 548K finance professional, or 200,000 IT workers are going to be building railroads? The continued push toward infrastructure projects ignores a huge segment of the unemployed population.

But the truth is, these steps still won’t make up for the seven million jobs we’ve lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America’s families have confronted for years.

Ok… great… you realize that.  So, what is the plan? We still are lacking a major plan.

The House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. And the lobbyists are already trying to kill it.

Are those lobbyists you said wouldn’t be involved with your administration?  Just wondering.

Third, we need to export more of our goods. Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America.

This will be a very interesting goal to watch.

First off, is he claiming to double the number of items exported or simply the dollar amount?

Second, since a doubling of exports (in dollars) has only happened once in a 5 year period since records started in 1960, I’m very curious to know how the government plans on doing this.

Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people.

HERE HERE!

I took on health care because of the stories I’ve heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who’ve been denied coverage; and families – even those with insurance – who are just one illness away from financial ruin.

But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.

But you didn’t take on health care, you’ve taken on health insurance reform.

The underlying issues facing health care – litigation, big pharma, waste – need to be addressed first. Plain and simple. Anything less is politics and foolish policy development.

While an option should be available for those who need insurance it should not be forced down the throats of the American populous. Roughly 65% of the nation does NOT want your version of health care and the longer you do not listen to the people who elected you the less likely you will be re-elected.

Just remember Scott Brown… the voters were looking for someone they felt would listen and act on their behalf, not someone who was going to say “this is what you need. Why? Because I said so”.

Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it’s not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It’s a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that’s been subject to a lot of political posturing.

The CBO has stated it MAY, not that it would.

That said, logic must be used here. Medicare and Medicare are on the verge of bankruptcy, as is our nation, how can one believe adding 30 million people to the health insurance books will end up costing LESS than what health insurance costs the nation now all the while helping our financial condition?

It simply does not work that way.

Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program.

Again, blaming someone else for your errors…  however this is flat out incorrect.

Bush expanded the US deficit to $700B in 8 years.  President Obama managed to just about quadruple the US deficit to 2.1T in ONE YEAR. Thanks to the Washington Post we can visualize this a bit more..

Via the Washington Post

From some on the right, I expect we’ll hear a different argument – that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts for wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, and maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is, that’s what we did for eight years. That’s what helped lead us into this crisis. It’s what helped lead to these deficits. And we cannot do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it’s time to try something new. Let’s invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let’s meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let’s try common sense.

You’ve already blown past that one…. You cannot finance you way out of an economic collapse with 5T in additional debt. That, too, will lead to a crisis. One that has the potential to turn the current economic conditions look like a good time.

Since the day I took office, we have renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We have made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives.

And is that why you refuse to call the two terrorists (Ft. Hood / Underwear bomber) by what they really are?  Let’s face it, they ARE terrorists so if you have renewed your focus you should also be charging these individuals AS terrorists and not just common criminals.

Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform — in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world – must know that they have our respect, our gratitude, and our full support.

HERE HERE!

I campaigned on the promise of change – change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change – or at least, that I can deliver it.

Your political decisions and personal actions both show that, no, you cannot deliver the change you promised the nation.

This was nothing more than self-worship and smoke and mirrors once again.

Tags: ,



 
Jan
27
Posted (Van Santos) in Technology on January-27-2010

Apple has sex appeal, don’t get me wrong, but I have long been questioning the usefulness of some recent products – AppleTV, iPod Touch, Air…The iPad only continues me to wonder “Really, what is the point?”

Really, just take a look:

Come on, it’s a giant iPhone!

This isn’t a device that is “bridging the gap” between the iPhone and the Laptops… this is Apple’s moment of corporate masturbation where they try to push a device to the public, based on pure sex appeal, in the belief you will buy it simply because this is their latest “it” thing.

It is not worth it. For the wonderful price point of $499 you get:

  • 9.7-inch diagonal LED-backlit glossy touchscreen (1024×768 resoltuion)
  • 1GHz Apple A4 processor
  • 16GB, 32GB, 64GB drives
  • WiFi (802.11 a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 2.1 with EDR support
  • 3G model: quad-band GSM/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900MHz), tri-band UMTS/HSDPA (850/1900/2100MHz)
  • Digital Compass, A-GPS (3G model)
  • 3.5-mm stereo headphone jack
  • Built-in speakers
  • Microphone
  • SIM card tray (3G model)
  • Height: 9.56 inches, Width: 7.47 inches, Depth: 0.5 inches
  • 25Whr lithium-polymer battery, up to 10 hours web surfing via WiFi, watching videos, or listening to music

Call me crazy but why would I want to spend $500 for a device that is, admittedly, sexy but can be easily matched or outperformed by other devices?  Case in point, the Freescale Tablet. The semiconductor company recently introduced their own line of tablet devices for $300 less than Apple AND it includes the additional features of:

  • Built-in webcam
  • Adobe Flash Support
  • USB Ports
  • Bluetooth
  • A full OS, not iPhone “lite” OS Apple will be slapping on this

If I want a tablet, I want one that will allow me the free will to do what I please – be it program and develop to my standards or simply surf websites that utilize flash. While one can debate the need for a tablet device that only holds minimal processing power, the need for an iPad seems flat out pointless when there are clearly more cost effective options on the market.

So, Apple, what is the point?

Tags: , , ,



 
Jan
26
Posted (Van Santos) in Politics on January-26-2010

I’ve held off on this post for roughly a week as I wanted to watch the political fallout take place before drawing any conclusions.

The very first conclusion one must draw is the election of Scott Brown was a fluke, a political outlier, and voting behavior will return to “normal” once the next round of elections take place.

Do I think that is the case? No, but we have to acknowledge that is possibility.

Was health care reform the driving factor in the Brown election?

While the data points to health care being the largest single issue in the election (56% of voters), Martha Coakley won this segment of the population by a 53% to 46% margin. It doesn’t seem to be a clear sign that voters put Brown into office because they oppose the proposed legislation, does it? Brown obtained his support in areas that are traditionally Republican strongholds – the Economy and National Security.

The administration apparently thinks the election of Scott Brown was due to economic reasons as there have been a number of significant actions taken on their part since last Tuesday. Viewing the November elections as a potential lost cause if things do not turn around, the administration took a knee jerk reaction and announced significant bank regulation and a freeze on discretionary spending. Unfortunately both actions will have little impact on the economy this year, and the bank regulation has the ability – if implemented incorrectly – to do more damage to the economy than inaction on behalf of the administration.

Why do I describe their action as “knee jerk”? I’m sorry to say but the horse is out of the barn, the barn is on fire and the well has run dry.  The economic policy of the last 20 years has set the nation on the current path, and the sudden expansion of the US debt/monetary base over the last year have all but placed another economic collapse (and currency collapse) in the cards for the United States. Simply saying “well, let’s separate investment banks from retail banks” has no impact on the underlying problems.

If not health care, national security or economics, what was this election about?

Yes, these factors played into Scott Brown winning his seat but I believe this election was more about frustration with politicians in general, rather than a specific political agenda. Politicians have a nasty habit of saying what is important to them and ignoring the voices of those they serve and it appears voters have said “Enough”.

The people of Massachusetts have said listen to us, listen to our overall concerns, and they picked the candidate – regardless of party – who they felt would actually do so, as well as best represent their needs on a national stage.

This should act as a wakeup call to any other politician who thinks they have the ability to push their agent forward when the constituents they serve are saying otherwise.

Tags: , ,



 
Jan
22
Posted (Van Santos) in Just Stuff, Life on January-22-2010

Belief in any form can be overwhelmingly powerful, and as a matter of personal opinion I hold that it can be the strongest emotional/psychological state a person can experience. Belief has the ability to be the strongest force any person can manifest from within themselves. Once belief has manifested anything is genuinely possible for that individual.

What about faith? What about confidence? What about persistence in order to obtain something?

They are all meaningless without the fundamental foundation of belief.

If you have faith in something, say that an event will take place, you are saying – essentially – that the event will take place because you believe it to be so. If you say you have the ability to accomplish something because of confidence in your abilities to do so, you are saying you believe in your abilities to bring an end result into reality. You will not quit until you reach your goal because you desire the objective and you believe you will obtain it. If you continue to pursue a goal, if you continue to pursue a dream, if you do something – anything – in a repetitious manner expecting your actions to satisfy your desires you believe it will happen, thus you continue to do so until it does.

While we walk through life everyday simply performing tasks that we know must take place in order to keep a sense of balance or social responsibility, such as waking up on time in order to go to work and paying bills, the true motivation that keeps humanity (as a whole) moving forward is the belief that something will be rewarded to those who continue to push foward.  When broken down on an individual level it does not matter what, exactly, that is… just that something will be given in order to move forward.

Without a pay check would you go to work? Without a motivator would you get up routinely at a specific time?

No.

The belief that life (or your actions) have a point, the belief that you will be able to obtain your desires, the belief that you have the ability to fulfill your dreams, is what continues you to move you forward.  Without it what is the point?

Conversely, the same may be true. The *lack* of belief may be the strongest emotional force known to humanity.

A lack of belief transmits the viewpoint that nothing – or very little –  is possible, be it the ability to accomplish a goal or desire, simply because what one aims for is a dream.. a fantasy… and realm that is unattainable.

A lack of belief is saying that something does not deserve the time and energy. A lack of belief is saying something is unattainable or untrue.

The irony in the outline above is that  a lack of belief requires that one *believes* such a thing was unattainable; ergo the power of belief remains the most powerful force within human psychology. Be it a positive or negative the fact that one has the ability to say something will or will not happen shows just how powerful belief is.

You have the ability to do anything in this world. If you want to change society or, if you desire to change the impact of one specific situation, you have the capability to do so… if you believe you can. If you believe you have no ability to impact the situation that, too, is true.

Believe in yourself, believe in what you are capable of, and believe that something of significance can come to fruition…

…if you do anything is truly possible…

Tags: , , ,



 
Jan
21
Posted (Van Santos) in Just Stuff on January-21-2010

As I sit here thinking about life there seems to be a stream of consciousness sensation that I  cannot shake, that does not dissipate…  This overwhelming feeling does not fade into the background much like other pointless but entertaining thoughts on life.

Let me share the sensations and thoughts I am feelings in hopes of striking an emotional chord:

1) What do your dreams forecast?

Do you think of the past or do you think of the future?  If your dreams are based in what you once knew what, exactly, does that say about your current understanding of life? What does that say about your ability cope with your current reality? What does that say about your ability to grow and achieve the things you desire for life?

2) Are you paying attention?

Really.

Are you paying attention?

The world around you is changing at an alarming rate, but are you changing with it?

Are you simply living your life – the comfortable life you know – or are you taking steps to grow as a person? If a sudden and dramatic change was introduced into your world would you know what to do/how to react or would you simply continue to do what is comfortable for you?

3) Are you fulfilled as a person?

Since I asked the question, I should be the first to answer.

Me, no, I am not.

Why?

Because I am not living life to the fullest.

While I am more prepared to do so today than anytime in the last two years, I am still holding emotions and development back because of where I am in life.

Why is that?

Because I do not feel I can/have the ability to do so under my current conditions.

That does not mean I have given up on my hopes of development, on my desire to grow and better those around me, it simply means I have to understand my limits as of this moment. Once I find the opportunity to continue my grown on the scale I feel is required, I will.

What about you?

Will you?

4) If everything you knew was to be shown as false today would you be able to survive tomorrow?

This is a critical question.

While I think the socio-economic conditions facing the United States are down right scary, if not horrific,  I ask this question question due to the general reaction of those around me when faced with such a scenario.

Very few people understand or are willing to accept that the world around them is on the verge of change, dramatic change, unlike any this nation has faced before. If that happened today, if everything you thought you knew about politics and economics was show to be incorrect in a matter of hours, would you be able to understand and cope with that fact?

Take a moment and think about that… If the answer is no you may want to look at your understanding of life, how it fits into the world around you, and how you can survive if it changes with no warning.

5) Do you know who you truly are?

This question has no hidden meaning, no explanation beyond the surface…

Do you know who you are? Do you know how you would react in different situations in life and do you know where you are headed?

If not, why?

That should be enough to get it you thinking.  I hope you enjoy your evening.

Tags: , ,