Jun
01
Posted (Van Santos) in Politics on June-1-2009

In an interesting move, China has suspended diplomatic ties with North Korea over the latest military actions:

China suspended government exchanges with North Korea after Kim Jong-Il’s regime last week tested a nuclear device and fired short-range missiles, Yonhap News said.

China has halted plans to send officials to North Korea and won’t accept visits from Kim’s government either, the Korean- language news agency said today, citing unidentified diplomatic sources in Beijing.

China’s foreign ministry has said the country “resolutely opposes” North Korea’s nuclear test. China on May 25 agreed with the U.S., Japan and Russia to work toward a United Nations Security Council resolution censuring North Korea. The U.S. and Japan want the statement to call for cutting the communist country’s global financial ties, UN diplomats said.

As China was North Korea’s biggest political supporter in the past, what signal does this send and how will North Korea react? Is this political grandstanding or something more on the part of China?

Related posts:

  1. U.S. set to “intercept” North Korean Ship Suspected of Proliferating Missiles, Nukes
  2. Again, what’s up with North Korea?
  3. North Korea also test-fires short-range missile
  4. NKorea confirms 'successful' nuclear test
  5. Asian nations look to 'lead world'

Comments:
Mike on June 2nd, 2009 at 5:13 am #

The Bloomberg article you link to describes the Chinese halting government-level visits between the two countries. That is not ’severing diplomatic ties’.

Severing diplomatic ties is a far more serious step and generally refers to the closing of embassies and the withdrawal of the diplomatic corps.

Van Santos on June 2nd, 2009 at 11:27 am #

Hi Mike – I did not say they were severing, but suspended diplomatic ties. I would assuming suspending would allow China to keep the embassies (and other connections) running as usual without recalling them.

Thanks for the input.
V

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: