May
06
Posted (Van Santos) in Thoughts on May-6-2009

Several weeks back the news was a buzz about Miss California, Carrie Prejean.  Not because she actually won anything but because she made specific comments about gay marriage – more specifically, the fact that her interpretation of faith did not allow for gay marriage.  

Well, her comments – she says – caused her the crown of Miss USA.

Today the web is abuzz with “revealing pictures” of Carrie Prejean.  Apparently, when she first started modeling Ms. Prejean took some nude photos.  But where they nude?  Here is the photo in question via The Dirty.com.  (Yes, this is safe for work)

Because of this picture the Miss California USA officials are thinking of stripping her of her title.  

Frankly, I don’t care if she posed nude or semi-nude.  It really doesn’t concern me.  What gets me here is that I think – really think – this young woman is being penalized for her views. Because she said something unpopular now the “news” is digging into her past, looking for something to really hang her on.

Carrie Prejean stood up for what she believes in and the the world is chastising her.  Based off of her comments and this single picture, I don’t think she deserves the negative press she is getting.  Yes, she has made herself a public figure…but is this really the “Freedom of Speech” we want in the United States?

Listen, she could say her views on faith allow for midget tossing while smoking a bong on the 3rd Sunday of ever second month. Just because one doesn’t care for what she is saying, or believe what she is saying, doesn’t give them the right to attack her.  Do we want to let a segment of the population rip others apart simply because they were not happy with something that was said?  

Bottom line, if what someone says isn’t criminal speech, why do we, the general public, allow such behavior to take place?

Related posts:

  1. Carrie Prejean, the *former* Miss California, is looking for a new job
  2. Trump – It's the same answer the president of the United States gave
  3. Holy god, Carrie Prejean is.. well.. not connected to reality
  4. What does “Freedom of Speech” mean to you?
  5. An Open Letter to John McCain – Re: Your speech

Comments:
OzSoapbox on May 7th, 2009 at 6:08 am #

I think if you’re going to enter a public competition, expect there’s a chance you’ll be publicly ripped apart.

Sure she might not have chosen to be asked a potentially controversial question, but in this day and age if you’re going to express 1950s views expect to get served.

Free speech goes both ways.

Van Santos on May 7th, 2009 at 8:11 am #

No, I agree. If you enter the public life you are a target. Plain and simple.

BUT I think there is a different between freedom of speech and hiding behind the mantra of freedom of speech in order to decimate an individual for what he/she believes.

My problem is with the mentality that the press/paparazzi/whoever rip apart individuals simply because their views differ.

It is the concept of respect that seems to be missing.

Gianna on May 7th, 2009 at 2:44 pm #

you know she signed an agreement that she was NOT allowed to contract with anyone without express agreement from the pageant…I don’t feel sorry for her…I think beauty pageants suck and suck people’s souls out…

I could give a shit about her political views one way or the other…she broke her contract…it wasn’t because of her views. that’s just the hype that is being spinned….

her views were actually known when she won the competition …it’s that she contracted with an anti-gay marriage activism group that got her in trouble by breaking her contract.

this is all hype. and if you’re gonna be stupid enough to want to be in a beauty pageant and sign your rights away…then that’s her problem

Van Santos on May 7th, 2009 at 6:14 pm #

Agreed – if she broke a contract, then she must pay the price for breaking the contract.

I have to disagree, however, that it has nothing to do with her views. I think the attention drawn because of her comments created an environment that pushed others to go looking for her demons.

I seems too… coincidental.

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: